Skip to main content

H.R. 1001

Referred to Committee

To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.

Introduced 2/5/2025•119th Congress•House

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

5/14/2025 • Senate

Summary

This bill directs the Bureau of Reclamation and the Western Area Power Administration, in consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, to enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and address the impact that the 2024 record of decision entitled Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. The memorandum of understanding must include a plan to (1) address the effects that the decision may have on the fund's obligations, (2) address the impact that the decision has on hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam, and (3) identify impacts that the decision has had on species listed as threatened or endangered species.

By way of background, Reclamation published a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 for the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) in 2024. The SEIS revises the 2016 LTEMP Record of Decision to address two issues: (1) responding to the threat of the invasive smallmouth bass below Glen Canyon Dam, and (2) incorporating the latest sediment science to assess when high-flow experiments should be conducted in order to protect the endangered humpback chub.

Introduced in House • 2/5/2025

Enter your district to see how this bill affects your community
-

Topics & Subjects

ArizonaCaliforniaDams and canalsEnvironmental assessment, monitoring, researchFishesGovernment trust fundsLakes and riversNevadaWildlife conservation and habitat protection

Congressional Votes (0)

No recorded votes yet

Roll call votes will appear here as the bill moves through Congress

Related Federal Spending

Sponsor & Cosponsors (3)

Party Breakdown

0
Democrats
3
Republicans
0
Independents

Sponsor

RL
Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

Republican • WY

Sponsored 2/5/2025

Cosponsors (2)

R[
Rep. Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2]

R-UT-2

Joined 2/11/2025

R[
Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4]

R-UT-4

Joined 2/26/2025

Bill Journey

Originated in the House

Introduced

February 5, 2025

Committee Review

February 12, 2025

Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

Floor Debate

May 13, 2025

Passed Chamber

May 13, 2025

Other Chamber

President

Enacted into Law

Text Versions (4)

Referred in Senate5/14/2025
Engrossed in House5/13/2025
Reported in House4/17/2025
Introduced in House2/5/2025

Committee Reports (1)

Details

Bill TypeHR
Current StatusReferred to Committee
Cosponsors2

Sources and method

· Record updated Nov 5, 2026
  • Congress.govLibrary of Congress
    Status, actions, sponsors, cosponsors, committees and text
    Record updated Nov 5, 2026 · Loaded Nov 5, 2026, 8:21 PM ET
  • CRS bill summaryCongressional Research Service, via Congress.gov
    Official summary
    Summary of the “Introduced in House” version, Feb 5, 2025 · Loaded Nov 5, 2026, 8:21 PM ET
  • CBO cost estimatesCongressional Budget Office
    Cost estimates
    Latest estimate May 27, 2025 · Loaded Nov 5, 2026, 8:21 PM ET
  • USAspending.govU.S. Department of the Treasury
    Related Federal Spending section
  • FEC filingsFederal Election Commission
    Funding & Lobbying section
  • Lobbying disclosures (LDA)Secretary of the Senate and Clerk of the House
    Funding & Lobbying section

All sources: Public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105) · Method: Data sources → · Campaign finance →

AI-written text on this page is labeled where it appears. It is written from the sources above and is not a source itself. How we analyze data →

Dates shown where the source reports one. “Loaded” is when CIV.IQ last fetched the record.