Skip to main content

H.R. 4943

Referred to Committee

CLOUD Act

Introduced 2/6/2018•115th Congress•House

Latest Action

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

2/6/2018 • House

Summary

Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act or the CLOUD Act

This bill amends the federal criminal code to specify that an electronic communication service (ECS) or remote computing service (RCS) provider must comply with existing requirements to preserve, backup, or disclose the contents of an electronic communication or noncontent records or information pertaining to a customer or subscriber, regardless of whether the communication or record is located within or outside the United States.

An ECS or RCS provider may challenge a domestic warrant that compels disclosure of the contents of an electronic communication if:

  • the customer or subscriber is not a U.S. citizen or national, lawful permanent resident, corporation, or other unincorporated entity;
  • the customer or subscriber does not reside in the United States; and
  • the required disclosure creates a material risk that the provider violates the laws of a foreign government with which the United States has in effect an executive agreement on data access.

In response to an order from a foreign government with which the United States has an executive agreement on data access, an ECS or RCS provider may:

  • intercept or disclose the contents of an electronic communication, and
  • disclose the contents of a stored electronic communication or noncontent records or information pertaining to a subscriber or customer.

It establishes a framework to allow the United States to enter into executive agreements with foreign governments to govern data access. To be valid, an executive agreement must meet certain requirements, including that the foreign government affords robust procedural privacy protections and adopts minimization procedures.

This bill does not preclude a foreign authority from obtaining assistance in a criminal investigation or prosecution.

Introduced in House • 2/6/2018

Enter your district to see how this bill affects your community
-

Topics & Subjects

Computer security and identity theftComputers and information technologyCongressional oversightCriminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationDiplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroadGovernment information and archivesHuman rightsInternet and video servicesInternet, web applications, social mediaLegislative rules and procedureRight of privacy

Congressional Votes (0)

No recorded votes yet

Roll call votes will appear here as the bill moves through Congress

Related Federal Spending

Sponsor & Cosponsors (11)

Party Breakdown

3
Democrats
8
Republicans
0
Independents

Sponsor

R[
Rep. Collins, Doug [R-GA-9]

Republican • GA-9

Sponsored 2/6/2018

Cosponsors (10)

R[
R[
Rep. Issa, Darrell E. [R-CA-49]

R-CA-49

Joined 2/6/2018

R[
Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1]

D-WA-1

Joined 2/6/2018

R[
Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10]

R-PA-10

Joined 2/6/2018

R[
R[

Bill Journey

Originated in the House

Introduced

February 6, 2018

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Committee Review

Floor Debate

Passed Chamber

Other Chamber

President

Enacted into Law

Text Versions (1)

Introduced in House2/6/2018

Details

Bill TypeHR
Current StatusReferred to Committee
Cosponsors10