Skip to main content

H.R. 45

Referred to Committee

Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017

Introduced 1/3/2017•115th Congress•House

Latest Action

Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.

1/5/2017 • House

Summary

Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017

This bill amends the Administrative Procedure Act to revise and expand the requirements for federal agency rulemaking by requiring agencies, in making a rule, to base all preliminary and final factual determinations on evidence and to consider the legal authority under which the rule may be proposed, the specific nature and significance of the problem the agency may address with the rule, any reasonable alternatives for the rule, and the potential costs and benefits associated with such alternatives.

The bill requires agencies to publish advance notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register for major rules and for high-impact rules (rules having an annual cost on the economy of $100 million or $1 billion or more, respectively) and for negative-impact on jobs and wages rules and those that involve a novel legal or policy issue arising out of statutory mandates. The notice must include a written statement identifying the nature and significance of the problem the agency may address with a rule, the legal authority under which the rule may be proposed, the nature of and potential reasons to adopt a novel legal or policy position, and a solicitation for written data, views, or arguments from interested persons.

Additionally, the bill: (1) sets forth criteria for issuing major guidance (agency guidance that is likely to lead to an annual cost on the economy of $100 million or more, a major increase in cost or prices, or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or ability to compete) or guidance that involves a novel legal or policy issue arising out of statutory mandates; and (2) expands the scope of judicial review of agency rulemaking by allowing immediate review of rulemaking not in compliance with notice requirements and establishing a substantial evidence standard for affirming agency rulemaking decisions.

Introduced in House • 1/3/2017

Enter your district to see how this bill affects your community
-

Topics & Subjects

Administrative law and regulatory proceduresAdministrative remediesEconomic performance and conditionsEvidence and witnessesGovernment information and archivesJudicial review and appealsOffice of Management and Budget (OMB)

Congressional Votes (0)

No recorded votes yet

Roll call votes will appear here as the bill moves through Congress

Related Federal Spending

Sponsor & Cosponsors (6)

Party Breakdown

1
Democrats
5
Republicans
0
Independents

Sponsor

R[
Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6]

Republican • VA-6

Sponsored 1/3/2017

Cosponsors (5)

R[
R[
Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21]

R-TX-21

Joined 1/3/2017

R[
Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10]

R-PA-10

Joined 1/3/2017

R[
Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-32]

R-TX-32

Joined 1/3/2017

R[
Rep. Franks, Trent [R-AZ-8]

R-AZ-8

Joined 1/3/2017

Bill Journey

Originated in the House

Introduced

January 3, 2017

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Committee Review

Floor Debate

Passed Chamber

Other Chamber

President

Enacted into Law

Text Versions (1)

Introduced in House1/3/2017

Details

Bill TypeHR
Current StatusReferred to Committee
Cosponsors5