WHERE
Where do Deborah Ross's campaign contributions come from?
Funding summary
- Total raised
- $2.0M
- Total spent
- $1.4M
- Cash on hand
- $1.4M
Where the money came from
- Individual donors$1.1M(57%)
- PACs$809K(41%)
- Political parties$4K(0%)
- Self-funding$0(0%)
- Other receipts$32K(2%)
Top industries
Of $116K in itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. This is only a slice of total fundraising — PACs, parties, small-dollar donors, and self-funding are not included here.
- Transportation$23K
- Finance & Real Estate$20K
- Advocacy & Nonprofits$14K
- General Business$13K
- Government$13K
An additional $612K in itemized donations couldn't be classified — either the donor left the employer field blank or listed “retired”/“self-employed,” or the employer didn't match a known industry.
Vote-finance correlation
Data through Sep 2026 · Sources: 2 — FEC individual filings (2026 cycle), Congress.gov roll calls (119th Congress) [61]
This analysis shows how Legislator Deborah Ross voted on bills related to different industry sectors. It also shows how much money she received from those sectors. There is a moderate pattern between donation amounts and her voting record. This means that as donation amounts from a sector increased, her yea rate (percentage of votes cast as "yea") tended to increase as well. For example, the "Other" sector donated $474,000 and she voted yea on 53.6% of related bills. The "Defense" sector donated $0, and she voted yea on 52.9% of related bills.
Fewer than 5 other members of the NC House delegation have comparable data right now, so no peer comparison is shown.
This analysis shows factual patterns in public data. Campaign contributions are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Voting alignment with donor industries is common across all legislators. Correlation does not indicate causation or improper behavior.
Campaign finance data from FEC.gov. Totals cover the current 2025–26 election cycle. Industry breakdown covers only itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. Full methodology