WHERE
Where do Ro Khanna's campaign contributions come from?
Funding summary
- Total raised
- $10.6M
- Total spent
- $5.1M
- Cash on hand
- $10.7M
Where the money came from
- Individual donors$10.1M(96%)
- PACs$2K(0%)
- Political parties$0(0%)
- Self-funding$0(0%)
- Other receipts$438K(4%)
Top industries
Of $3.5M in itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. This is only a slice of total fundraising — PACs, parties, small-dollar donors, and self-funding are not included here.
- General Business$2.2M
- Technology & Media$422K
- Legal & Lobbying$383K
- Healthcare$181K
- Finance & Real Estate$157K
An additional $1.0Min itemized donations couldn't be classified — either the donor left the employer field blank or listed “retired”/“self-employed,” or the employer didn't match a known industry.
Vote-finance correlation
Data through Jul 2026 · Sources: 2 — FEC individual filings (2026 cycle), Congress.gov roll calls (119th Congress) [168]
This analysis shows how Representative Ro Khanna's donations align with his voting record. There is a strong pattern between donation amounts and yea rates. This means that when a sector donated more, Representative Khanna tended to vote yea more often on bills related to that sector. The Finance/Insurance/Real Estate sector had the largest donations. Representative Khanna voted yea on 48.3% of bills from this sector. The Energy/Natural Resources sector had fewer donations. He voted yea on 27.3% of bills from this sector.
Fewer than 5 other members of the CA House delegation have comparable data right now, so no peer comparison is shown.
This analysis shows factual patterns in public data. Campaign contributions are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Voting alignment with donor industries is common across all legislators. Correlation does not indicate causation or improper behavior.
Campaign finance data from FEC.gov. Totals reflect the current two-year cycle. Industry breakdown covers only itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. Full methodology