WHERE
Where do Dan Crenshaw's campaign contributions come from?
Funding summary
- Total raised
- $4.1M
- Total spent
- $4.8M
- Cash on hand
- $469K
Where the money came from
- Individual donors$2.7M(66%)
- PACs$841K(20%)
- Political parties$0(0%)
- Self-funding$0(0%)
- Other receipts$548K(13%)
Top industries
Of $591K in itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. This is only a slice of total fundraising — PACs, parties, small-dollar donors, and self-funding are not included here.
- General Business$256K
- Finance & Real Estate$72K
- Energy & Natural Resources$61K
- Legal & Lobbying$59K
- Technology & Media$49K
An additional $1.8Min itemized donations couldn't be classified — either the donor left the employer field blank or listed “retired”/“self-employed,” or the employer didn't match a known industry.
Vote-finance correlation
Data through Jul 2026 · Sources: 2 — FEC individual filings (2026 cycle), Congress.gov roll calls (119th Congress) [168]
Dan Crenshaw voted on 168 bills. He received $2,844,521.82 in donations. There is a weak positive pattern between donation amounts and yea rates. This means larger donations may align with a higher yea rate. Crenshaw voted yes on all 22 bills from the Energy/Natural Resources sector. He voted yes on 77.8% of bills from the Ideology/Single-Issue and Lawyers & Lobbyists sectors. He voted yes on 83.3% of bills from the Other sector. He voted yes on 82.1% of bills from the Finance/Insurance/Real Estate sector.
Fewer than 5 other members of the TX House delegation have comparable data right now, so no peer comparison is shown.
This analysis shows factual patterns in public data. Campaign contributions are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Voting alignment with donor industries is common across all legislators. Correlation does not indicate causation or improper behavior.
Campaign finance data from FEC.gov. Totals reflect the current two-year cycle. Industry breakdown covers only itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. Full methodology